When Market Competition Benefits Firms
نویسندگان
چکیده
A conventional wisdom in economics posits that more intense market competition, measured in almost any way, reduces firm profit. In this paper, we challenge this conventional wisdom in a simple Cournot model with strategic R&D investments wherein an efficient firm (dominant firm) competes against less efficient firms (fringe firms). We find that an increase in the number of fringe firms can stimulate R&D by the dominant firm, while it always reduces R&D by each of the fringe firms. More importantly, this force can be strong enough to compensate for the loss that arises from more intense market competition: the dominant firm’s profit may indeed increase with the number of fringe firms, quite contrary to the conventional wisdom. An implication of this result is far-reaching, as it gives dominant firms to help, rather than harm, fringe competitors. We relate this implication to a practice know as open knowledge disclosure, especially Ford’s strategy of disclosing its know-how publicly and extensively at the beginning of the 20th century. JEL classification: L13, O32, M21
منابع مشابه
The Timing and Returns of Mergers and Acquisitions in Oligopolistic Industries
This paper develops a real options model to study the interaction between industry structure and takeover activity. In an asymmetric industry equilibrium, firms have an endogenous incentive to merge when restructuring decisions are motivated by operating and strategic benefits. The model predicts that (i) the likelihood of restructuring activities is greater in more concentrated industries or i...
متن کاملExpansion of Location Theories of Firms and Products’ Consistency Using Triangular Distribution Approach
Abstract O ne of the main criticisms of location models is simplistic assumptions concerning the consumers’ distribution on the street or city. The location models usually make use of uniform distribution of consumers while it is not true in reality, and mostly the consumers’ accumulation is more in the city centers rather than suburb areas. This study deals with selectio...
متن کاملBad News is Good News: Propping and Tunnelling Evidence from China
When there is competition for the control over a listed firm, the contestants have to bid for it by committing their own resources to prop up the firm, which benefits ordinary outside shareholders. The existing literature has not provided clear evidence of propping and the conditions under which propping prevails. The evidence for the benefits of having a market for corporate control is also la...
متن کاملThickness and Competition in Ride-sharing Markets
We study the effects of thickness and competition on the equilibria of ride-sharing markets, in which price-setting firms provide platforms to match customers (“riders”) and workers (“drivers”). To study thickness, we vary the number of potential workers (“the labor pool”) and, to study competition, we change the number of firms from one to two. When the market is sufficiently thick, wage and w...
متن کاملOligopolistic Business-to-Business E-Market and Welfare
We examine the effect of an oligopolistic upstream electronic market on upstream and downstream prices. The analysis highlights the two sources of competition that a firm that source from an electronic market (e-market firm) face: competition with less efficient firms that source traditionally (t-market firms) and competition among e-market firms. When size of the upstream e-market is small, th...
متن کاملAuditor Type and Earnings Quality in Tehran Stock Exchange
This study examines the association between auditor type (public versus private) and earnings quality as measured by the levels of discretionary accruals in Iran. This study hypothesize that there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between public and private sector audit firms when there is low incentives for auditors to provide high-quality audits in Iran. Using a sample...
متن کامل